Some artificial food” target=”_blank”>sweeteners<, according to world-regions researchers.
In a study published Thursday in the journal PLOS Medicine, authors from the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research and Sorbonne Paris Nord University analyzed data from 102,865 French adults participating the NutriNet-Santé study.
HOW SMALL CHANGES IN YOUR DIET CAN RESULT IN REALLY BIG HEALTH PAYOFFS
That study is an ongoing web-based cohort that was started in 2009 by the nutrition-and-fitness Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), in which participants enroll voluntarily and self-report medical history and sociodemographic, genres and lifestyle data.
The objective was to investigate the associations between artificial sweetener consumption and cancer risk.
The data was gathered from 24-hour dietary records and patients were followed up within around eight years.
After collecting cancer diagnosis information, the researchers used statistical analyses to examine the proposed association.
They adjusted for age, sex, education, physical activity, smoking, body mass index, height, weight-gain during follow-up, diabetes, family history of cancer, as well as baseline intakes of energy, alcohol, sodium, saturated fatty acids, fiber, sugar, whole-grain foods, and dairy products.
In comparison with non-consumers, people who consumed more had a higher risk of overall cancer.
US ADULT CIGARETTE SMOKING RATE FELL DURING FIRST YEAR OF PANDEMIC
In particular, the authors found aspartame and acesulfame were associated with increased cancer risk and higher risks were observed for cancer and nutrition-and-fitness.
Limitations to the study include potential selection bias, residual confounding and reverse causality – though sensitivity analyses were performed to address these concerns.
The researchers said their findings “provide important and novel insights for the ongoing re-evaluation of food additive sweeteners by the European Food Safety Authority and other health agencies globally.”
Video
The authors said their findings need to be replicated in other large-scale cohorts and have underlying mechanisms clarified by experimental studies.
According to the National Cancer Institute, questions about the relationship between artificial sweeteners and cancer arose when early studies showed that cyclamate in combination with saccharin caused bladder cancer in laboratory animals.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“However, results from subsequent carcinogenicity studies (studies that examine whether a substance can cause cancer) of these sweeteners have not provided clear evidence of an association with cancer in humans. Similarly, studies of other FDA-approved sweeteners have not demonstrated clear evidence of an association with cancer in humans,” it said.
